IBM · Mid-level
Next: your first full round
One full round, as long as theirs, shows where you stand before you work on anything specific.
Pick a round to see what it asks of you and where you stand on it.
Test applied SQL, Python, and Spark reasoning, implementation quality, performance awareness, and production data judgment.
Probe nulls, duplicates, late records, and empty inputs.
Ask for shuffle, partition, memory, and join tradeoffs.
Select one SQL task, one Python task, and one PySpark task from recent work or practice. For each, write the input grain, schema assumptions, null rules, duplicate rules, and expected output before coding.
IBM reports mention SQL, Python, PySpark, Spark, ETL, modeling, and pipeline work. The exact questions for this round are not confirmed, so prepare across the stated technical areas.
Company research
Your first try takes the full 40 minutes, like the real one.
IBM says its process varies by role and location and may include assessments, interviews, and a final decision. Recent Data Engineer candidates describe one to three technical stages, with HR and manager conversations in some loops. Common technical topics include SQL, Python, Spark or PySpark, pipelines, data modeling, cloud platforms, and production reliability. The exact format and length aren’t published.
Worth redoing if you hear something from the recruiter that contradicts this.
Every round you’ve done for this job, newest first.
Technical Data Engineering Interview and Managerial Project Discussion have no attempts yet.
For your PySpark task, decide when to repartition, broadcast, or accept a shuffle. Explain how skew, join size, partition count, and memory pressure affect the choice. Include one empty-input and one invalid-type case.
One candidate describes practical Spark transformation, out-of-memory diagnosis, partitioning, join strategy, and Adaptive Query Execution. This is one report, not a confirmed IBM format.
Company researchMy Recent IBM Interview Experience for a Data Engineer Role (4 Years of Experience)
Trace two normal rows and two edge rows through the written solution. State the output after each important step. Mark where a duplicate, null, skewed key, or failed cast changes the result.
The round purpose requires accurate implementation and edge-case reasoning. A manual trace gives you material to explain correctness before discussing optimization.
Suggested approach
You have three selected tasks, written assumptions, one Spark tradeoff decision, and four traced inputs. You can then attempt the first practice problem.
Focus on “Tuning Partitions,” “Join Strategy Hints,” and “Adaptive Query Execution.” The page is technical reference material, not interview practice.
Use it to support your explanation of shuffles, skew, joins, partition counts, runtime plan changes, and memory risks.
Focus on “Online Assessment” and “Interview.” IBM says questions vary by role and experience level, and may include coding challenges.
Use it to choose mixed SQL, Python, and Spark practice rather than assuming one fixed IBM question format.
Questions that fill in what the research couldn’t tell us.
Will this role include an online assessment, and is it timed?
How many technical rounds are planned, and will coding use SQL, Python, or PySpark?
Will the manager round assess project ownership, system design, or both?